Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1960 > April 1960 Decisions > G.R. No. L-10831 28 April 28, 1960 - RED LINE TRANSPORTATION CO., INC. v. MARIANO GONZAGA

107 Phil 769:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-10831. April 28, 1960.]

RED LINE TRANSPORTATION CO., INC., Petitioner, v. MARIANO GONZAGA, Respondent.

Manuel O. Chan and Vicente Ampil for Petitioner.

Sixto Brillantes for Respondent.


SYLLABUS


1. NATURALIZATION; CONTENTS OF AFFIDAVIT OF TWO CREDIBLE PERSONS MUST BE SUBSTANTIATED AT THE HEARING. — When the Revised Naturalization Law requires that the petition for naturalization be supported by affidavit of at least two credible persons stating, among other things, that they personally know the petitioner to be a resident of the Philippines for the period of time required by the law and that petitioner possesses the qualifications and none of the disqualifications to become a citizen of the Philippines, it follows, as an inevitable corollary, that those statements must be substantiated by the affiants at the hearing of the case.

2. ID.; ID.; "CREDIBLE" PERSON; SCOPE OF TERM. — A "credible" person, within the purview of the Naturalization Law, is one who has a good standing in the community; who is known to be honest and upright; who is reputed to be trustworthy and reliable; and whose word may be taken on its face value, as a good warranty of the worthiness of the petitioner.

3. ID.; ID.; CHARACTER WITNESSES ARE INSURERS OF CHARACTER OF PETITIONER. — The character witnesses are in a way insurers of the character of the petitioner.


D E C I S I O N


PADILLA, J.:


Under Rule 43 of the Rules of Court the petitioner prays for a review of the decision rendered by the Public Service Commission, granting authority to the respondent to operate, with fixed routes and regular term and time schedule for the transportation passengers and freight and under the terms and conditions set forth therein, one truck in the line Aparri-Rizal via Dungao, Faire, Piat and Tuao; one truck on the line Aparri-Sta. Ana; and one truck on the Aparri- Tuguegarao, all in the province of Cagayan.

The Public Service Commission made the following findings and pronouncements —

As amended, this is an application for a certificate of public convenience to operate in auto-truck service for the transportation of passengers and freight on the following lines:.

Aparri (Cagayan) — Rizal (Cagayan) via Dungao, Faire, Piat and Tuao;

Aparri (Cagayan) — Sta. Ana (Cagayan); and

Aparri (Cagayan) — Tuguegarao (Cagayan).

with a proposed equipment of eight (8) units.

This application is opposed by the Bachrach Motor Co., Inc. (owners and operators of the Rural Transit), Red Line Transportation Co., Inc., and Estate of E. E. Vda. de Fernando for the reasons stated in their respective written oppositions attached to the records.

After applicant had finished the presentation of his evidence he filed a petition for provisional authority to operate on the lines applied for and this Commission in an order dated July 18, 1955 authorized applicant to operate provisionally one truck on the line Sta. Ana-Aparri and one on the line Aparri-Rizal, pending final determination of this case.

It appears from the evidence submitted by the applicant and the records of this Commission that applicant is an authorized TPU auto- truck operator on the line Aparri-Piat by virtue of the certificate of public convenience issued in his favor in Case No. 67507; that there is an urgent need for the operation of additional buses on the lines applied for as the present operators are rendering inadequate service; that during the summer season there are plenty of passengers because there are barrio fiestas, town fiestas and other special occasions: that the buses running on the lines proposed to be served by applicant are very insufficient to handle the volume of passengers during those months; that operators at present do not follow their time schedules and passengers sometimes have to wait for hours before they can ride; that Aparri is a commercial center of Cagayan and there is a big volume of passengers traveling to and from Aparri coming from the different points along the lines applied for; that there are many merchants who go to Aparri, Piat, Tuao, Camalaniugan, Buguey, Gonzaga and Sta. Ana; that during the months from January to August there is a big number of people from the Ilocos region who go to Buguey, Gonzaga, Gattaran, Lallo and Alcala to help in the harvest in those towns and the present means of transportation are not enough to handle all these passengers because buses are oftentimes packed to capacity and there are many people waiting for transportation along the way who cannot be accommodated; that in Sta. Ana they catch plenty of fish which the inhabitants carry to Aparri, Buguey, Gonzaga and other towns and there are many fish vendors who travel from Sta. Ana to Aparri and vice- versa: that Tuguegarao as the capital of the province of Cagayan is also a commercial center and the buses of the Red Line Transportation Co., Rural Transit and the Angat-Manila Transportation are inadequate to meet the needs of the travelling public; that the buses of the oppositors are already fully loaded when they leave Aparri and cannot pick up passengers waiting along the road; that the Red Line Transportation Co. is rendering poor service and the people are complaining of the lack of transportation facilities.

On the other hand, the oppositors Red Line Transportation Co. and Rural Transit submitted evidence to the effect that there are already many TPU auto-truck operators on the lines applied for in the present case; that the authorized capacity of the buses operating on these lines ranges from 30 to 60 but they carry an average load of only from 18 to 20 passengers; and that the present services of the said oppositors and other operators on the lines in question are more than sufficient to take care of the needs of the traveling public.

After a careful study of the evidence submitted by the parties as well as the records of this Commission on auto-truck services on the lines covered by the present application, we are convinced that there is sufficient traffic to warrant the grant to the applicant of authority to operate one truck on the line Aparri-Rizal via Dungao, Faire, Piat & Tuao; one truck on the line Aparri-Sta. Ana and one truck on the line Aparri-Tuguegarao, instead of the eight trucks proposed by the applicant.

x       x       x


Petitioner contends that the Public Service Commission should have denied the application for the reason that the respondent is already a holder of a certificate of public convenience to operate an auto truck service from the town of Aparri to the municipality of Piat, such certificate having been granted subject to a condition that during the five-year life of the certificate its holder would not ask for extension of line or trips or increase of equipment, and that there is absolutely no evidence to support the decision.

The questions to be decided then are (1) whether the Public Service Commission erred in granting the certificate of public convenience to the respondent, the latter being a holder of another certificate granted to him in case No. 67507, subject to a condition that during its lifetime of five years he (the respondent) would not ask for extension of line or trips or increase of equipment; and (2) whether there is evidence to support the decision complained of.

The petitioner claims that the condition imposed in case No. 67507 was voluntarily offered by the respondent, and for that reason it desisted from further objecting to the application filed therein, believing that the certificate of public convenience to be granted then to the respondent, subject to the condition referred to, would not harm or cause damage to its transportation business, and it agreed to the granting and issuance of the certificate to the Respondent. Petitioner further contends that the auto truck service applied for and authorized on the line from Aparri to Rizal, for all intents and purposes is an extension of the Aparri-Piat line.

In the certificate granted in case No. 67507, the line is from the town of Aparri passing through the towns of Camalaniugan, Lallo, Gattaran, Faire, to Piat, the line terminal. In the certificate granted by the Public Service Commission in its decision now under review, the first line is from Aparri passing through the towns of Camalaniugan, Lal-lo, Gattaran, Faire (up to this point the same partial lines at that granted in case No. 67507), Tuao, to Rizal, its terminal; the second line is from Aparri passing through the towns of Camalaniugan, Gonzaga, to Santa Ana, its terminal; and the third line is from Aparri passing through the towns of Camalaniugan, Lal-lo, Gattaran (up to this point the same partial line as that granted in case No. 67507), Alcala, Amulung, Iguig to Tuguegarao, its terminal.

It is, therefore, apparent that the first line from Aparri to Rizal is not strictly an extension of the former line authorized in case No. 67507, because it deviates from Faire to Tuao to reach Rizal, the line terminal. Neither is the third line from Aparri to Tuguegarao, its terminal, strictly an extension of the former line authorized in case No. 67507, because although passing through the same town up to Gattaran the former line continues to Faire and Piat, the line terminal; whereas the third line is from Gattaran passing through the towns of Alcala, Amulung, Iguig to Tuguegarao, the line terminal.

And even granting that the first and third lines or routes under the last certificate granted by the Public Service Commission were an extension of the Aparri-Piat line under the former certificate granted by the Commission, still if the Commission is satisfied that public service or convenience requires or demands that the line of such extension be run, operated and served and that the applicant is financially capable of operating it the Commission has the power to grant a certificate of public convenience to the applicant for the operation of such extension line. 1

As to the claim that there is no evidence to sustain the decision, we find that there is enough evidence to support it. Not only did the Public Service Commission take into consideration the evidence submitted by the parties but it also considered the records of auto-truck services on the lines within the territory where the respondent applies to operate his lines.

The decision under review is affirmed, with costs against the petitioner.

Paras, C.J., Bengzon, Bautista Angelo, Labrador, Concepción, Endencia, and Gutiérrez David, JJ., concur.

Endnotes:



1. Section 16(m), Commonwealth Act No. 146, as amended; Pampanga Bus Company, Inc. v. Fernando Enriquez, 66 Phil., 645; Pasay Transportation Co., Inc. v. The Public Service Commission, 59 Phil., 278; Negros Ice & Cold Storage Co., Inc. v. Public Service Commission, Et Al., 90 Phil., 138; and Victory Liner, Inc. v. Saulog Transit, Inc., 99 Phil., 443; 53 Off. Gaz. 917) 5638.




Back to Home | Back to Main


ClubJuris.Com



April-1960 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-12170 April 18, 1960 - PEOPLE’S SURETY & INSURANCE CO. v. PAZ PUEY VDA. DE LIMCACO, ET AL.

    107 Phil 618

  • G.R. No. L-13285 April 18, 1960 - SIMEONA GANADEN VDA. DE URSUA v. FLORENIO PELAYO

    107 Phil 623

  • G.R. No. L-14133 April 18, 1960 - INS. CO. OF NORTH AMERICA v. PHIL. PORTS TERMINAL, INC.

    107 Phil 626

  • G.R. No. L-14159 April 18, 1960 - DANILO CHANNIE TAN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    107 Phil 632

  • G.R. No. L-13282 April 22, 1960 - LA CONSOLACION COLLEGE, ET AL. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

    107 Phil 636

  • G.R. No. L-12973 April 25, 1960 - BARENG v. HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS., ET AL.

    107 Phil 641

  • G.R. No. L-13317 April 25, 1960 - R. S. PAÑGILINAN & CO. v. HON. JUDGE L. PASICOLAN, ETC., ET AL.

    107 Phil 645

  • G.R. No. L-13557 April 25, 1960 - DONATO LAJOM v. HON. JOSE N. LEUTERIO

    107 Phil 651

  • G.R. No. L-13981 April 25, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ELIAS RODRIGUEZ

    107 Phil 659

  • G.R. No. L-14224 April 25, 1960 - REHABILITATION FINANCE CORPORATION v. LUCIO JAVILLONAR, ET AL.

    107 Phil 664

  • G.R. No. L-14889 April 25, 1960 - NORBERTO LOPEZ, ET AL. v. AMADO SANTIAGO, ETC., ET AL.

    107 Phil 668

  • G.R. No. L-14901 April 25, 1960 - VERONICA DE LA CRUZ, ET AL., v. MANUEL SAGALES, ET AL.

    107 Phil 673

  • G.R. No. L-11797. 27 April 27, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ELEUTERIO BELTRAN

    107 Phil 676

  • G.R. No. L-12058 April 27, 1960 - JOSE BERNABE & CO., INC. v. DELGADO BROTHERS, INC.

    107 Phil 679

  • G.R. No. L-12410 April 27, 1960 - MIGUEL G. PACTOR v. LUCRECIA P. PESTAÑO

    107 Phil 685

  • G.R. No. L-12639 April 27, 1960 - PABLO A. VELEZ v. PAV WATCHMEN’S UNION and the COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS

    107 Phil 689

  • G.R. No. L-12679 April 27, 1960 - MARIA C. VDA. DE LAPORE v. NATIVIDAD L. PASCUAL

    107 Phil 695

  • G.R. No. L-12917 April 27, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PASCUAL LABATETE

    107 Phil 697

  • G.R. No. L-13222 April 27, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. AQUILINO ARAGON and RAMON LOPEZ

    107 Phil 706

  • G.R. No. L-13224 April 27, 1960 - PEDRO TAN CONA v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    107 Phil 710

  • G.R. No. L-13315 April 27, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BUENAVENTURA BULING

    107 Phil 712

  • G.R. No. L-13496 April 27, 1960 - Dy Shui Sheng v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    107 Phil 718

  • G.R. No. L-13653 April 27, 1960 - MUN. TREASURER OF PILI, CAMARINES SUR, ET AL. v. HON. PERFECTO R. PALACIO, ETC AND PALACIO

    107 Phil 724

  • G.R. No. L-13680 April 27, 1960 - MAURO LOZANA v. SERAFIN DEPAKAKIBO

    107 Phil 728

  • G.R. No. L-13708 April 27, 1960 - SECURITY BANK & TRUST CO., INC. v. GLOBE ASSURANCE CO., INC.

    107 Phil 733

  • G.R. No. L-14191 April 27, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ENRIQUE NARVAS

    107 Phil 737

  • G.R. No. L-14246 April 27, 1960 - TAN SENG PAO v. COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION, ET AL.

    107 Phil 742

  • G.R. No. L-14414 April 27, 1960 - SEVERINO SALEN and ELENA SALBANERA v. JOSE BALCE

    107 Phil 748

  • G.R. No. L-14576 April 27, 1960 - JOSE GONZALES, ET AL. v. BENIGNO ALDANA, ET AL.

    107 Phil 754

  • G.R. No. L-14967 April 27, 1960 - ORLANDO DE LEON v. HON. JESUS S. RODRIGUEZ, ETC., ET AL.

    107 Phil 759

  • G.R. No. L-15435 April 27, 1960 - VICTORIANO L. REYES, ET AL. v. JUDGE GUSTAVO VICTORIANO, ET AL.

    107 Phil 763

  • G.R. No. L-10831 28 April 28, 1960 - RED LINE TRANSPORTATION CO., INC. v. MARIANO GONZAGA

    107 Phil 769

  • G.R. No. L-12741 28 April 28, 1960 - DEMETRIA FLORES v. PHIL. ALIEN PROPERTY ADMINISTRATOR

    107 Phil 773

  • G.R. No. L-13118 April 28, 1960 - MACONDRAY & COMPANY, INC. v. DELGADO BROS. INC.

    107 Phil 779

  • G.R. No. L-13172 April 28, 1960 - GILBERT RILLON v. FILEMON RILLON

    107 Phil 783

  • G.R. No. L-13313 April 28, 1960 - AGRICULTURAL CREDIT COOPERATIVE ASSN. OF HINIGARAN v. ESTANISLAO YULO YUSAY, ET AL.

    107 Phil 791

  • G.R. No. L-13385 April 28, 1960 - SOCORRO KE. LADRERA v. SEC. OF AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES

    107 Phil 794

  • G.R. No. L-13501 April 28, 1960 - JOSE V. VILLASIN v. SEVEN-UP BOTTLING CO. OF THE PHILS.

    107 Phil 801

  • G.R. No. L-13718 April 28, 1960 - DEOGRACIAS REMO and MUN. OF GOA, CAM. SUR v. HON. PERFECTO R. PALACIO AND ANGEL ENCISO

    107 Phil 803

  • G.R. No. L-13911 April 28, 1960 - CESAR ROBLES, ET AL. v. DONATO TIMARIO, ET AL.

    107 Phil 809

  • G.R. No. L-14151 April 28, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ENCARNACION JACOBO

    107 Phil 821

  • G.R. No. L-14248 April 28, 1960 - NEW MANILA LUMBER COMPANY, INC. v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    107 Phil 824

  • G.R. No. L-14434 April 28, 1960 - EUSEBIO ESPINELI, ET AL. v. AMADO S. SANTIAGO, ET AL.

    107 Phil 830

  • G.R. No. L-14606 April 28, 1960 - LAGUNA TRANSPORTATION CO. INC. v. SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM

    107 Phil 833

  • G.R. No. L-14713 April 28, 1960 - MARIAN AFAN v. APOLINARIO S. DE GUZMAN

    107 Phil 839

  • G.R. No. L-15012 April 28, 1960 - ANTONIO DIMALIBOT v. ARSENIO N. SALCEDO

    107 Phil 843

  • G.R. No. L-15416 April 28, 1960 - UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES, ET AL. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

    107 Phil 849

  • Adm. Case No. 275 April 29, 1960 - GERVACIO L. LIWAG v. GILBERTO NERI

    107 Phil 852

  • G.R. No. L-7133 April 29, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MARTIN LAROSA, ET AL.

    107 Phil 854

  • G.R. No. L-9532 April 29, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. NORBERTO CATAO, ET AL.

    107 Phil 861

  • G.R. No. L-10675 April 29, 1960 - COMPAÑIA MARITIMA v. ERNESTA CABAGNOT VDA. DE HIO, ET AL.

    107 Phil 873

  • G.R. No. L-11754 April 29, 1960 - SATURNINO D. VILLORIA v. SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES, ET AL.

    107 Phil 879

  • G.R. No. L-11773 April 29, 1960 - JUAN T. CHUIDIAN v. VICENTE SINGSON ENCARNACION, ET AL.

    107 Phil 885

  • G.R. No. L-12089 April 29, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PATRIA E. YANZA

    107 Phil 888

  • G.R. No. L-12165 April 29, 1960 - MANILA SURETY & FIDELITY CO., INC. v. ANTONIO VILLARAMA, ET AL.

    107 Phil 891

  • G.R. No. L-2180 April 29, 1960 - SOLOMON A. MAGANA v. MANUEL AGREGADO, ET AL.

    107 Phil 900

  • G.R. No. L-12189 April 29, 1960 - FRANCISCA GALLARDO v. HERMENEGILDA S. MORALES

    107 Phil 903

  • G.R. No. L-12270 April 29, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BIENVENIDO CANO, ET AL.

    107 Phil 909

  • G.R. No. L-12256 April 29, 1960 - MANILA UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE CO., INC. v. BIENVENIDO A. TAN, ETC. ET AL.

    107 Phil 911

  • G.R. No. L-12503 April 29, 1960 - CONFEDERATED SONS OF LABOR v. ANAKAN LUMBER COMPANY, ET AL.

    107 Phil 915

  • G.R. No. L-12538 April 29, 1960 - GAUDENCIO LACSON v. AUDITOR GENERAL, ET AL.

    107 Phil 921

  • G.R. No. L-12644 April 29, 1960 - KOPPEL (PHILIPPINES) INC. v. RUSTICO A. MAGALLANES

    107 Phil 926

  • G.R. No. L-12817 April 29, 1960 - JULIO D. ENRIQUEZ, SR. v. PEDRO M. GIMENEZ

    107 Phil 932

  • G.R. No. L-12872 April 29, 1960 - DELGADO BROS., INC. v. LI YAO & COMPANY, ET AL.

    107 Phil 939

  • G.R. No. L-12945 April 29, 1960 - COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. MARIANO R. LACSON

    107 Phil 945

  • G.R. No. L-12965 April 29, 1960 - CARMELINO MENDOZA v. JOSEFINA DE CASTRO

    107 Phil 948

  • G.R. No. L-13030 April 29, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FRANCISCO MITRA, ET AL.

    107 Phil 951

  • G.R. Nos. L-13099 & L-13462 April 29, 1960 - COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. BOHOL LAND TRANSPORTATION CO.

    107 Phil 965

  • G.R. No. L-13101 April 29, 1960 - PANGASINAN TRANSPORTATION CO. INC. v. SILVERIO BLAQUERA

    107 Phil 975

  • G.R. No. L-13334 April 29, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PEDRO M. DURAN, JR.

    107 Phil 979

  • G.R. No. L-13459 April 29, 1960 - DEOMEDES S. ROJAS v. ROSA PAPA, ET AL.

    107 Phil 983

  • G.R. No. L-13500 April 29, 1960 - SUN BROTHERS & COMPANY v. MANILA PORT SERVICE, ET AL.

    107 Phil 989

  • G.R. No. L-13569 April 29, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MAMERTO RESPECIA, ET AL.

    107 Phil 995

  • G.R. No. L-13667 April 29, 1960 - PRIMITIVO ANSAY, ETC., ET AL. v. BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT CO., ET AL.

    107 Phil 997

  • G.R. No. L-13753 April 29, 1960 - DOMINGO CUI, ET AL. v. LUCIO ORTIZ, ETC.

    107 Phil 1000

  • G.R. No. L-13778 April 29, 1960 - PHILIPPINE EDUCATION CO., INC. v. UNION OF PHILIPPINE EDUCATION EMPLOYEES, ET AL.

    107 Phil 1003

  • G.R. No. L-13888 April 29, 1960 - NATIONAL SHIPYARD AND STEEL CORPORATION v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

    107 Phil 1006

  • G.R. No. L-14092 April 29, 1960 - SOLEDAD A. VERZOSA v. AUGUSTO BAYTAN, ET AL.

    107 Phil 1010

  • G.R. No. L-14271 April 29, 1960 - YEK TONG LIN FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE CO., LTD. v. PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK

    107 Phil 1019

  • G.R. No. L-14298 April 29, 1960 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. BRICCIO INCIONG, ET AL.

    107 Phil 1024

  • G.R. No. L-14323 April 29, 1960 - ANTERO SORIANO, JR. v. EMILIO L. GALANG

    107 Phil 1026

  • G.R. No. L-14334 April 29, 1960 - CARLOS GOZON v. ISRAEL M. MALAPITAN, ET AL.

    107 Phil 1033

  • G.R. No. L-14347 April 29, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROMUALDO LOPEZ

    107 Phil 1039

  • G.R. No. L-14487 April 29, 1960 - LEVY HERMANOS, INC. v. DIEGO PEREZ

    107 Phil 1043

  • G.R. No. L-14548 April 29, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. VALERIO ANDRES

    107 Phil 1046

  • G.R. No. L-14677 April 29, 1960 - MARGARITA LEYSON LAURENTE v. ELISEO CAUNCA

    107 Phil 1051

  • G.R. No. L-14880 April 29, 1960 - COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. FILIPINAS COMPAÑIA DE SEGUROS

    107 Phil 1055

  • G.R. No. L-15048 April 29, 1960 - MARIANO QUITIQUIT v. SALVADOR VILLACORTA

    107 Phil 1060

  • G.R. No. L-15125 April 29, 1960 - FRANCISCA ROMASANTA v. FELIX SANCHEZ

    107 Phil 1065

  • G.R. No. L-15372 April 29, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. VICENTE B. QUESADA

    107 Phil 1068

  • G.R. No. L-15609 April 29, 1960 - RAFAEL MARCELO v. EULOGIO MENCIAS ETC., ET AL.

    107 Phil 1071

  • G.R. No. L-15689 April 29, 1960 - MARIA GERVACIO BLAS, ET AL. v. CECILIA MUÑOZ-PALMA, ET AL.

    107 Phil 1078

  • G.R. No. L-15838 April 29, 1960 - CAYETANO DANGUE v. FRANKLIN BAKER COMPANY OF THE PHILIPPINES, ET AL.

    107 Phil 1083

  • G.R. No. L-15966 April 29, 1960 - MAXIMA ACIERTO, ET AL. v. VICTORINA G. DE LAPERAL, ET AL.

    107 Phil 1088

  • G.R. No. L-12090 April 30, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FEDERICO BAUTISTA, ET AL.

    107 Phil 1091

  • G.R. No. L-12716 April 30, 1960 - JOSE BALDIVIA, ET AL. v. FLAVIANO LOTA

    107 Phil 1099

  • G.R. No. L-12880 April 30, 1960 - FLORA A. DE DEL CASTILLO, ET AL. v. ISABEL S. DE SAMONTE

    107 Phil 1105

  • G.R. No. L-12892 April 30, 1960 - CITY OF CEBU v. NATIONAL WATERWORKS and SEWERAGE AUTHORITY

    107 Phil 1112

  • G.R. No. L-13340 April 30, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ALEJANDRO GUZMAN

    107 Phil 1122

  • G.R. No. L-13429 April 30, 1960 - LUIS SANCHO v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    107 Phil 1128

  • G.R. No. L-13493 April 30, 1960 - LUCIANO DE LA ROSA v. GOVERNMENT SERVICE INSURANCE SYSTEM

    107 Phil 1131

  • G.R. No. L-14117 April 30, 1960 - PANGASINAN TRANSPORTATION CO., INC. v. JUANITO NASTOR

    107 Phil 1136

  • G.R. No. L-14277 April 30, 1960 - MANUEL L. FERNANDEZ v. ELOY B. BELLO

    107 Phil 1140

  • G.R. No. L-14580 April 39, 1960 - BEOFNATO ATAY, ET AL. v. DIEGO H. TY DELING, ET AL.

    107 Phil 1146

  • G.R. No. L-14714 April 30, 1960 - ARISTON ANDAYA, ET AL. v. MELENCIO MANANSALA

    107 Phil 1151

  • G.R. Nos. L-14881 & L-15001-7 April 30, 1960 - JOSE B. YUSAY v. HILARIO ALOJADO, ET. AL.

    107 Phil 1156

  • G.R. No. L-14925 April 30, 1960 - MARTA VDA. DE DE LA CRUZ v. GENARO TAN TORRES, ET AL.

    107 Phil 1163