Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1960 > April 1960 Decisions > G.R. No. L-15838 April 29, 1960 - CAYETANO DANGUE v. FRANKLIN BAKER COMPANY OF THE PHILIPPINES, ET AL.

107 Phil 1083:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-15838. April 29, 1960.]

CAYETANO DANGUE, Petitioner, v. FRANKLIN BAKER COMPANY OF THE PHILIPPINES and WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, Respondents.

Teofilo Mendoza, Jr. for Petitioner.

Paulino Manongdo for respondent Company.


SYLLABUS


1. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION; EYE INJURY SUSTAINED OUTSIDE OF EMPLOYMENT BUT AGGRAVATED BY ACCIDENT MET IN THE COURSE OF EMPLOYMENT, COMPENSABLE. — It appears that petitioner, an employee of respondent company, while cleaning his kaingin, his right eye was hit by the leaves of a shrub. Since his right eye was becoming reddish in color, he consulted the respondent company’s physician. Apparently, finding nothing serious, he was allowed to work. Again, while petitioner was in the course of his work as sheller (shelling coconuts), his right eye was struck by a flying speck of coconut shell. Upon the advice of the company’s physician, petitioner was given leave of absence, during which time, he was thrice operated on his injured eye. As a result, he sustained a 16.4% loss of vision. Held: It is true that petitioner’s right eye was injured while he was engaged in the performance of work outside of his employment, but said injury became worse or was aggravated by the accident which he met, while performing work in the course of his employment in respondent company. Consequently, petitioner is entitled to compensation.

2. ID.; FAILURE OF EMPLOYER TO CONTROVERT CLAIM FOR COMPENSATION, EFFECT OF. — As a rule, when the employer does not controvert the claim of the employee for compensation, he is also deemed to have waived his right to interpose any defense, and he could not prove anything in relation thereto. (Victorias Milling Co. Inc. v. Workmen’s Compensation Commission, L-10533, May 13, 1957.


D E C I S I O N


BARRERA, J.:


This is a petition for review on certiorari of the decision dated March 12, 1959 of respondent Workmen’s Compensation Commission, and its resolution, en banc, of June 23, 1959.

In the morning of July 17, 1954, while petitioner Cayetano Dangue, an employee of respondent Franklin Baker Company of the Philippines, was cleaning his kaingin, his right eye was hit by the leaves of a shrub known as "payang-payang" Since his right eye was becoming reddish in color, he consulted respondent company’s physician on July 19, 1954. Apparently finding nothing serious, he was allowed to work. On the following day, July 20, 1954, while petitioner was in the course of his work as sheller (shelling coconuts), his right eye was struck by a flying speck of coconut shell. As a result, there developed an unbearable pain and blurring of vision. On July 21, 1954, upon the advice of respondent company’s physician, petitioner was given leave of absence, which was extended from time to time, until November 10, 1954, when he resumed work. During this time, he was thrice operated on his injured eye and sustained a 16.4% loss of vision, thus causing his temporary total disability and permanent partial disability. For the entire period of his said leave of absence, from July 21 to November 10, 1954, petitioner was not paid any compensation by respondent company.

On September 6, 1954, petitioner filed with the Department of Labor a complaint against respondent company praying, inter alia, for payment of compensation in accordance with the Workmen’s Compensation Act. 1

On June 10, 1957, after due hearing, the Hearing Officer of respondent Commission at San Pablo City rendered a decision (Annex A) ordering respondent company to pay petitioner the amount of P460.77, as compensation pursuant to Sections 14 and 17 of the aforecited Act.

On June 21, 1957, respondent company filed with respondent Commission a petition for review of said decision of the Hearing Officer. On March 12, 1959, respondent Commission rendered a decision dismissing petitioner’s claim for compensation and absolving respondent company from liability. From this decision, petitioner filed a motion for reconsideration, which motion, was denied by respondent Commission in its resolution en banc of June 23, 1959 (Annex C). 2 Hence, this petition for review.

Petitioner claims that respondent Commission erred in dismissing his claim for compensation.

We agree with petitioner. It is not disputed that petitioner, after consulting the company physician about his eye, was allowed to report for work. This fact indicates that the first injury, if at all, received on July 17, 1954 was not serious. If it were so, respondent company would have undoubtedly, and by all means, advised or even prevented him from reporting for work, and petitioner himself would not have been able to go about his task, considering the extreme sensitiveness of the human eye. It appears, however, that after he met the second accident while working for the company as a sheller, petitioner was, on the following day, or on July 21, 1954, advised to go on leave, which indicates that this second accident was serious, as in fact it was, as he had to be operated on thereafter and his leave continued until November 10, 1954. True it is, that petitioner’s right eye was first injured while he was engaged in the performance of work outside of his employment, but said injury became worse or was aggravated by the accident which he met, while performing work in the course of his employment in respondent company. Consequently, he is entitled to compensation.

"Recovery will not be prevented because the consequences of the injury received in the accident were aggravated by the employee’s physical condition at the time the injury was received." (71 C.J. 606.)

"But even assuming that appellant’s left eye was already defective when he entered appellee’s employ, nevertheless it is clear that the defect was somehow aggravated or accelerated by his employment and ultimately necessitated an operation by reason of the accident in question. Appellee is not therefore relieved of responsibility under the Workmen’s Compensation Law, for acceleration of a previously existing disease in an injury under Workmen’s Compensation Laws (Brightman v. Aetna Life Insurance Company, 220 Mass. 17, 107 E.E. 527), and it is sufficient that the injury and a pre-existing disease combined to produce disability in order to make the injury compensable." (71 C. J., 614; Izar v. Kellog and Sons, 40 Off. Gaz., 167)

"The fact that the employee suffered from impaired vision prior to the accident does not prevent the loss or further impairment of his vision from constituting an injury such as the statute authorizes compensation for." (Hicatur v. Hunter, 39 Pa. Super. 393.)

"Where a steel chip flew into an employee’s eye, accelerating the development of a cataract and causing the loss of sight, he suffered an injury within the statute." (Kucinic v. United Engineering and Foundry Co., 160 A. 344; 110 Pa. Super. 261.) "Where a miner while at work was struck so hard a blow on the left eye by a piece of coal that it accelerated the development of a cataract in that eye, and made necessary an operation which resulted in the loss of the vision of the eye, he suffered an injury within the statute." (Sakunas v. Philadelphia and Reading Coal and Iron Co., 78 Pa. Super. 261.)

"An employee was struck in the eyes by a stream of analyne. His eyes were injured and he was advised by the employer’s physician to wear dark glasses. A month later while wearing these glasses, he fell downstairs and permanently injured one eye. The second injury was held the natural and proximate result of the first accident." (VI Schneider’s Compensation Text, 39-40, and cases therein cited.)

"The Workmen’s Compensation Act is a social legislation designed to give relief to the workman who has been the victim of an accident the pursuit of his employment and must be liberally construed to attain the purpose for which it has been enacted." (71 C.J. 341-352; Ramos v. Poblete 73 Phil., 241; Francisco v. Consing, 63 Phil., 354.) 3

Petitioner also contends that respondent Commission erred in absolving respondent company from liability, in spite of its non- controversion of petitioner’s claim and admission of his injury in the performance of his regular work.

There is also merit in the contention. Examination of the records of the case discloses that the Employer’s Report of Accident or Sickness, signed by respondent company’s personnel manager, Mr. Gregorio Imperial, contains the following: (1) as to controversion, said report stated "No", indicating that respondent company will not controvert petitioner’s claim; (2) as to the question, "Was he (petitioner) injured in regular occupation?", the answer is "Yes" ; and (3) as to the description of the accident, said report stated: "while taking off the shell from a coconut, a speck of coconut shell hit his (petitioner’s) eye." As a rule, when the employer does not controvert the claim of the employee for compensation, he is also deemed to have waived his right to interpose any defense, and he could not prove anything in relation thereto. (Victorias Milling Co., Inc. v. Workmen’s Compensation Commissioner, G.R. No. L-10533, prom. May 13, 1957.)

Wherefore, the appealed decision and resolution of respondent Commission are set aside. Respondent Franklin Baker Co. is hereby ordered to pay petitioner the amount of P460.77, as compensation in accordance with Sections 14 and 17 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, and to pay the amount of P5.00 to respondent Commission, pursuant to Section 55 of the same Act. With costs against respondent company. So ordered.

Paras, C.J., Bengzon, Padilla, Montemayor, Labrador, Concepcion and Endencia, JJ., concur.

Endnotes:



1. Act No. 3428, as amended.

2. With Associate Commissioner Nieves Baens del Rosario dissenting in a separate opinion.

3. See II Francisco, Labor Laws (3rd Ed.) 137-145.




Back to Home | Back to Main


ClubJuris.Com



April-1960 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-12170 April 18, 1960 - PEOPLE’S SURETY & INSURANCE CO. v. PAZ PUEY VDA. DE LIMCACO, ET AL.

    107 Phil 618

  • G.R. No. L-13285 April 18, 1960 - SIMEONA GANADEN VDA. DE URSUA v. FLORENIO PELAYO

    107 Phil 623

  • G.R. No. L-14133 April 18, 1960 - INS. CO. OF NORTH AMERICA v. PHIL. PORTS TERMINAL, INC.

    107 Phil 626

  • G.R. No. L-14159 April 18, 1960 - DANILO CHANNIE TAN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    107 Phil 632

  • G.R. No. L-13282 April 22, 1960 - LA CONSOLACION COLLEGE, ET AL. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

    107 Phil 636

  • G.R. No. L-12973 April 25, 1960 - BARENG v. HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS., ET AL.

    107 Phil 641

  • G.R. No. L-13317 April 25, 1960 - R. S. PAÑGILINAN & CO. v. HON. JUDGE L. PASICOLAN, ETC., ET AL.

    107 Phil 645

  • G.R. No. L-13557 April 25, 1960 - DONATO LAJOM v. HON. JOSE N. LEUTERIO

    107 Phil 651

  • G.R. No. L-13981 April 25, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ELIAS RODRIGUEZ

    107 Phil 659

  • G.R. No. L-14224 April 25, 1960 - REHABILITATION FINANCE CORPORATION v. LUCIO JAVILLONAR, ET AL.

    107 Phil 664

  • G.R. No. L-14889 April 25, 1960 - NORBERTO LOPEZ, ET AL. v. AMADO SANTIAGO, ETC., ET AL.

    107 Phil 668

  • G.R. No. L-14901 April 25, 1960 - VERONICA DE LA CRUZ, ET AL., v. MANUEL SAGALES, ET AL.

    107 Phil 673

  • G.R. No. L-11797. 27 April 27, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ELEUTERIO BELTRAN

    107 Phil 676

  • G.R. No. L-12058 April 27, 1960 - JOSE BERNABE & CO., INC. v. DELGADO BROTHERS, INC.

    107 Phil 679

  • G.R. No. L-12410 April 27, 1960 - MIGUEL G. PACTOR v. LUCRECIA P. PESTAÑO

    107 Phil 685

  • G.R. No. L-12639 April 27, 1960 - PABLO A. VELEZ v. PAV WATCHMEN’S UNION and the COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS

    107 Phil 689

  • G.R. No. L-12679 April 27, 1960 - MARIA C. VDA. DE LAPORE v. NATIVIDAD L. PASCUAL

    107 Phil 695

  • G.R. No. L-12917 April 27, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PASCUAL LABATETE

    107 Phil 697

  • G.R. No. L-13222 April 27, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. AQUILINO ARAGON and RAMON LOPEZ

    107 Phil 706

  • G.R. No. L-13224 April 27, 1960 - PEDRO TAN CONA v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    107 Phil 710

  • G.R. No. L-13315 April 27, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BUENAVENTURA BULING

    107 Phil 712

  • G.R. No. L-13496 April 27, 1960 - Dy Shui Sheng v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    107 Phil 718

  • G.R. No. L-13653 April 27, 1960 - MUN. TREASURER OF PILI, CAMARINES SUR, ET AL. v. HON. PERFECTO R. PALACIO, ETC AND PALACIO

    107 Phil 724

  • G.R. No. L-13680 April 27, 1960 - MAURO LOZANA v. SERAFIN DEPAKAKIBO

    107 Phil 728

  • G.R. No. L-13708 April 27, 1960 - SECURITY BANK & TRUST CO., INC. v. GLOBE ASSURANCE CO., INC.

    107 Phil 733

  • G.R. No. L-14191 April 27, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ENRIQUE NARVAS

    107 Phil 737

  • G.R. No. L-14246 April 27, 1960 - TAN SENG PAO v. COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION, ET AL.

    107 Phil 742

  • G.R. No. L-14414 April 27, 1960 - SEVERINO SALEN and ELENA SALBANERA v. JOSE BALCE

    107 Phil 748

  • G.R. No. L-14576 April 27, 1960 - JOSE GONZALES, ET AL. v. BENIGNO ALDANA, ET AL.

    107 Phil 754

  • G.R. No. L-14967 April 27, 1960 - ORLANDO DE LEON v. HON. JESUS S. RODRIGUEZ, ETC., ET AL.

    107 Phil 759

  • G.R. No. L-15435 April 27, 1960 - VICTORIANO L. REYES, ET AL. v. JUDGE GUSTAVO VICTORIANO, ET AL.

    107 Phil 763

  • G.R. No. L-10831 28 April 28, 1960 - RED LINE TRANSPORTATION CO., INC. v. MARIANO GONZAGA

    107 Phil 769

  • G.R. No. L-12741 28 April 28, 1960 - DEMETRIA FLORES v. PHIL. ALIEN PROPERTY ADMINISTRATOR

    107 Phil 773

  • G.R. No. L-13118 April 28, 1960 - MACONDRAY & COMPANY, INC. v. DELGADO BROS. INC.

    107 Phil 779

  • G.R. No. L-13172 April 28, 1960 - GILBERT RILLON v. FILEMON RILLON

    107 Phil 783

  • G.R. No. L-13313 April 28, 1960 - AGRICULTURAL CREDIT COOPERATIVE ASSN. OF HINIGARAN v. ESTANISLAO YULO YUSAY, ET AL.

    107 Phil 791

  • G.R. No. L-13385 April 28, 1960 - SOCORRO KE. LADRERA v. SEC. OF AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES

    107 Phil 794

  • G.R. No. L-13501 April 28, 1960 - JOSE V. VILLASIN v. SEVEN-UP BOTTLING CO. OF THE PHILS.

    107 Phil 801

  • G.R. No. L-13718 April 28, 1960 - DEOGRACIAS REMO and MUN. OF GOA, CAM. SUR v. HON. PERFECTO R. PALACIO AND ANGEL ENCISO

    107 Phil 803

  • G.R. No. L-13911 April 28, 1960 - CESAR ROBLES, ET AL. v. DONATO TIMARIO, ET AL.

    107 Phil 809

  • G.R. No. L-14151 April 28, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ENCARNACION JACOBO

    107 Phil 821

  • G.R. No. L-14248 April 28, 1960 - NEW MANILA LUMBER COMPANY, INC. v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    107 Phil 824

  • G.R. No. L-14434 April 28, 1960 - EUSEBIO ESPINELI, ET AL. v. AMADO S. SANTIAGO, ET AL.

    107 Phil 830

  • G.R. No. L-14606 April 28, 1960 - LAGUNA TRANSPORTATION CO. INC. v. SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM

    107 Phil 833

  • G.R. No. L-14713 April 28, 1960 - MARIAN AFAN v. APOLINARIO S. DE GUZMAN

    107 Phil 839

  • G.R. No. L-15012 April 28, 1960 - ANTONIO DIMALIBOT v. ARSENIO N. SALCEDO

    107 Phil 843

  • G.R. No. L-15416 April 28, 1960 - UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES, ET AL. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

    107 Phil 849

  • Adm. Case No. 275 April 29, 1960 - GERVACIO L. LIWAG v. GILBERTO NERI

    107 Phil 852

  • G.R. No. L-7133 April 29, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MARTIN LAROSA, ET AL.

    107 Phil 854

  • G.R. No. L-9532 April 29, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. NORBERTO CATAO, ET AL.

    107 Phil 861

  • G.R. No. L-10675 April 29, 1960 - COMPAÑIA MARITIMA v. ERNESTA CABAGNOT VDA. DE HIO, ET AL.

    107 Phil 873

  • G.R. No. L-11754 April 29, 1960 - SATURNINO D. VILLORIA v. SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES, ET AL.

    107 Phil 879

  • G.R. No. L-11773 April 29, 1960 - JUAN T. CHUIDIAN v. VICENTE SINGSON ENCARNACION, ET AL.

    107 Phil 885

  • G.R. No. L-12089 April 29, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PATRIA E. YANZA

    107 Phil 888

  • G.R. No. L-12165 April 29, 1960 - MANILA SURETY & FIDELITY CO., INC. v. ANTONIO VILLARAMA, ET AL.

    107 Phil 891

  • G.R. No. L-2180 April 29, 1960 - SOLOMON A. MAGANA v. MANUEL AGREGADO, ET AL.

    107 Phil 900

  • G.R. No. L-12189 April 29, 1960 - FRANCISCA GALLARDO v. HERMENEGILDA S. MORALES

    107 Phil 903

  • G.R. No. L-12270 April 29, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BIENVENIDO CANO, ET AL.

    107 Phil 909

  • G.R. No. L-12256 April 29, 1960 - MANILA UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE CO., INC. v. BIENVENIDO A. TAN, ETC. ET AL.

    107 Phil 911

  • G.R. No. L-12503 April 29, 1960 - CONFEDERATED SONS OF LABOR v. ANAKAN LUMBER COMPANY, ET AL.

    107 Phil 915

  • G.R. No. L-12538 April 29, 1960 - GAUDENCIO LACSON v. AUDITOR GENERAL, ET AL.

    107 Phil 921

  • G.R. No. L-12644 April 29, 1960 - KOPPEL (PHILIPPINES) INC. v. RUSTICO A. MAGALLANES

    107 Phil 926

  • G.R. No. L-12817 April 29, 1960 - JULIO D. ENRIQUEZ, SR. v. PEDRO M. GIMENEZ

    107 Phil 932

  • G.R. No. L-12872 April 29, 1960 - DELGADO BROS., INC. v. LI YAO & COMPANY, ET AL.

    107 Phil 939

  • G.R. No. L-12945 April 29, 1960 - COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. MARIANO R. LACSON

    107 Phil 945

  • G.R. No. L-12965 April 29, 1960 - CARMELINO MENDOZA v. JOSEFINA DE CASTRO

    107 Phil 948

  • G.R. No. L-13030 April 29, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FRANCISCO MITRA, ET AL.

    107 Phil 951

  • G.R. Nos. L-13099 & L-13462 April 29, 1960 - COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. BOHOL LAND TRANSPORTATION CO.

    107 Phil 965

  • G.R. No. L-13101 April 29, 1960 - PANGASINAN TRANSPORTATION CO. INC. v. SILVERIO BLAQUERA

    107 Phil 975

  • G.R. No. L-13334 April 29, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PEDRO M. DURAN, JR.

    107 Phil 979

  • G.R. No. L-13459 April 29, 1960 - DEOMEDES S. ROJAS v. ROSA PAPA, ET AL.

    107 Phil 983

  • G.R. No. L-13500 April 29, 1960 - SUN BROTHERS & COMPANY v. MANILA PORT SERVICE, ET AL.

    107 Phil 989

  • G.R. No. L-13569 April 29, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MAMERTO RESPECIA, ET AL.

    107 Phil 995

  • G.R. No. L-13667 April 29, 1960 - PRIMITIVO ANSAY, ETC., ET AL. v. BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT CO., ET AL.

    107 Phil 997

  • G.R. No. L-13753 April 29, 1960 - DOMINGO CUI, ET AL. v. LUCIO ORTIZ, ETC.

    107 Phil 1000

  • G.R. No. L-13778 April 29, 1960 - PHILIPPINE EDUCATION CO., INC. v. UNION OF PHILIPPINE EDUCATION EMPLOYEES, ET AL.

    107 Phil 1003

  • G.R. No. L-13888 April 29, 1960 - NATIONAL SHIPYARD AND STEEL CORPORATION v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

    107 Phil 1006

  • G.R. No. L-14092 April 29, 1960 - SOLEDAD A. VERZOSA v. AUGUSTO BAYTAN, ET AL.

    107 Phil 1010

  • G.R. No. L-14271 April 29, 1960 - YEK TONG LIN FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE CO., LTD. v. PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK

    107 Phil 1019

  • G.R. No. L-14298 April 29, 1960 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. BRICCIO INCIONG, ET AL.

    107 Phil 1024

  • G.R. No. L-14323 April 29, 1960 - ANTERO SORIANO, JR. v. EMILIO L. GALANG

    107 Phil 1026

  • G.R. No. L-14334 April 29, 1960 - CARLOS GOZON v. ISRAEL M. MALAPITAN, ET AL.

    107 Phil 1033

  • G.R. No. L-14347 April 29, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROMUALDO LOPEZ

    107 Phil 1039

  • G.R. No. L-14487 April 29, 1960 - LEVY HERMANOS, INC. v. DIEGO PEREZ

    107 Phil 1043

  • G.R. No. L-14548 April 29, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. VALERIO ANDRES

    107 Phil 1046

  • G.R. No. L-14677 April 29, 1960 - MARGARITA LEYSON LAURENTE v. ELISEO CAUNCA

    107 Phil 1051

  • G.R. No. L-14880 April 29, 1960 - COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. FILIPINAS COMPAÑIA DE SEGUROS

    107 Phil 1055

  • G.R. No. L-15048 April 29, 1960 - MARIANO QUITIQUIT v. SALVADOR VILLACORTA

    107 Phil 1060

  • G.R. No. L-15125 April 29, 1960 - FRANCISCA ROMASANTA v. FELIX SANCHEZ

    107 Phil 1065

  • G.R. No. L-15372 April 29, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. VICENTE B. QUESADA

    107 Phil 1068

  • G.R. No. L-15609 April 29, 1960 - RAFAEL MARCELO v. EULOGIO MENCIAS ETC., ET AL.

    107 Phil 1071

  • G.R. No. L-15689 April 29, 1960 - MARIA GERVACIO BLAS, ET AL. v. CECILIA MUÑOZ-PALMA, ET AL.

    107 Phil 1078

  • G.R. No. L-15838 April 29, 1960 - CAYETANO DANGUE v. FRANKLIN BAKER COMPANY OF THE PHILIPPINES, ET AL.

    107 Phil 1083

  • G.R. No. L-15966 April 29, 1960 - MAXIMA ACIERTO, ET AL. v. VICTORINA G. DE LAPERAL, ET AL.

    107 Phil 1088

  • G.R. No. L-12090 April 30, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FEDERICO BAUTISTA, ET AL.

    107 Phil 1091

  • G.R. No. L-12716 April 30, 1960 - JOSE BALDIVIA, ET AL. v. FLAVIANO LOTA

    107 Phil 1099

  • G.R. No. L-12880 April 30, 1960 - FLORA A. DE DEL CASTILLO, ET AL. v. ISABEL S. DE SAMONTE

    107 Phil 1105

  • G.R. No. L-12892 April 30, 1960 - CITY OF CEBU v. NATIONAL WATERWORKS and SEWERAGE AUTHORITY

    107 Phil 1112

  • G.R. No. L-13340 April 30, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ALEJANDRO GUZMAN

    107 Phil 1122

  • G.R. No. L-13429 April 30, 1960 - LUIS SANCHO v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    107 Phil 1128

  • G.R. No. L-13493 April 30, 1960 - LUCIANO DE LA ROSA v. GOVERNMENT SERVICE INSURANCE SYSTEM

    107 Phil 1131

  • G.R. No. L-14117 April 30, 1960 - PANGASINAN TRANSPORTATION CO., INC. v. JUANITO NASTOR

    107 Phil 1136

  • G.R. No. L-14277 April 30, 1960 - MANUEL L. FERNANDEZ v. ELOY B. BELLO

    107 Phil 1140

  • G.R. No. L-14580 April 39, 1960 - BEOFNATO ATAY, ET AL. v. DIEGO H. TY DELING, ET AL.

    107 Phil 1146

  • G.R. No. L-14714 April 30, 1960 - ARISTON ANDAYA, ET AL. v. MELENCIO MANANSALA

    107 Phil 1151

  • G.R. Nos. L-14881 & L-15001-7 April 30, 1960 - JOSE B. YUSAY v. HILARIO ALOJADO, ET. AL.

    107 Phil 1156

  • G.R. No. L-14925 April 30, 1960 - MARTA VDA. DE DE LA CRUZ v. GENARO TAN TORRES, ET AL.

    107 Phil 1163