Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1960 > August 1960 Decisions > G.R. No. L-13581 August 31, 1960 - EPIFANIO S. CESE v. GSIS

109 Phil 306:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

FIRST DIVISION

[G.R. No. L-13581. August 31, 1960.]

EPIFANIO S. CESE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. GOVERNMENT SERVICE INSURANCE SYSTEM, Respondent-Appellee.

Epifanio S. Cese for Appellant.

Leovigildo Monasterial and D. B. Panganiban for Appellee.


SYLLABUS


1. GOVERNMENT SERVICE INSURANCE SYSTEM; RETIREMENT; REMITTANCE OF CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE SYSTEM; DETERMINATION OF WHETHER EMPLOYER HAD PAID ALL PREMIUMS DUE. — Section 5 of Commonwealth Act No. 186, as amended, provides that in the retirement insurance of an employee of the Government, the monthly contributions are not to be borne by the employee concerned alone but by both the employer and the employee, the percentage rate depending upon the employee’s amount of salary. This section likewise provides that it is the employer who deducts and withholds from the monthly salary of every employee in its service the premiums payable by him, and to remit the same, together with its corresponding share, to the System. In the disposition of a claim, therefore, it is important to determine whether or not the employer had paid all the premiums due from it to the System during its membership therewith.

2. ID.; ID.; ID.; ID.; WHEN EMPLOYER SHOULD BE IMPLEADED IN AN ACTION. — Where an employer had already withdrawn its membership from the System, it is necessary that the question of whether or not said employer should still be required to pay all the premium obligations concommitant with the payment to the employee of said benefits be resolved. For a complete adjudication of the case it is therefore necessary that the employer be impleaded in the action.

3. PLEADING AND PRACTICE; AMENDMENTS TO PLEADINGS FAVORED SPEEDY TRIAL OF CAUSES. — It is a general rule that amendments to pleadings are favored and should be liberally allowed in furtherance of justice in order that every case may so far as possible be determined on its real facts and in order to speed the trial of causes, or prevent the circuity of action and unnecessary expense, unless there are circumstances such as inexcusable delay, or the taking of the adverse party by surprise, or the like, which might justify a refusal of permission to amend. (41 Am. Jur. pp. 490-491.)


D E C I S I O N


GUTIERREZ DAVID, J.:


This is an appeal from an order of the Court of First Instance of Manila.

Epifanio S. Cese had been a member of the police force of the municipality of San Isidro, province of Nueva Ecija, from March 10, 1927 to January 31, 1956. After his separation from the government service on the date last mentioned, he filed with the Government Service Insurance System an application for retirement benefits under Commonwealth Act No. 186, as amended, which application was however, disapproved by the said office.

On July 12, 1957, the said Epifanio Cese filed with the Court of First Instance of Manila a petition for" Certiorari and Mandamus" praying that the Government Service Insurance System be required to pay him retirement benefits under the aforementioned law.

The Government Service Insurance System, as party respondent, answered the petition, claiming that the petitioner had no right to retirement benefits for the reason that his employer, the municipality of San Isidro, Nueva Ecija, had already withdrawn its membership from the System because of its inability to shoulder the premium obligations of its insured and retirable employees and that the petitioner failed to exercise his right of option to retire while his employer was still a member.

After the issues had thus been joined, the Government Service Insurance System filed a motion to require the petitioner to amend his complaint so as to include the municipality of San Isidro province of Nueva Ecija, as respondent in the action. Finding merit in the motion, the lower court, on December 21, 1957, issued an order requiring the petitioner to implead the said municipality as party Respondent. Motion for reconsideration of this order having been denied, the petitioner appealed directly to this Court.

It is not disputed that although membership with the Government Service Insurance System is not compulsory for municipalities below first class, like the municipality of San Isidro, the latter had been a member thereof from November 30, 1937 to December 12, 1952. Neither is there any dispute that the herein petitioner then an employee of that municipality had also become a member of the System. For this reason the petitioner claims that he is entitled to the benefits of Commonwealth Act No. 186, as amended.

The sole question at issue is whether the said municipality of San Isidro, province of Nueva Ecija, should be included as party respondent so as to completely adjudicate petitioner’s claim for retirement benefits.

Section 5 of Commonwealth Act No. 186, as amended, provides that in the retirement insurance of an employee of the Government, the monthly contributions are not to be borne by the employee concerned alone but by both the employer and the employee, the percentage rate depending upon the employee’s amount of salary. This section likewise provides that it is the employer who deducts and withholds from the monthly salary of every employee in its service the premiums payable by him, and to remit the same, together with its corresponding share, to the Government Service Insurance System. In the disposition of petitioner’s claim, therefore, it is important to determine whether or not his former employer, the municipality of San Isidro, had paid all the premiums due from it to the System during its membership therewith. And inasmuch as it had already withdrawn such membership, a further question to be resolved is whether or not, despite its withdrawal, the said municipality must still be required to pay all the premium obligations concommitant with the payment to petitioner of the said benefits. For a complete adjudication of the case, it is then necessary that the municipality of San Isidro, province of Nueva Ecija, be impleaded in the action. We thus find that the court a quo has committed no error in ordering the herein petitioner to amend his complaint so as to include as party respondent the said municipality. It is a general rule that amendments to pleadings are favored and should be liberally allowed in furtherance of justice, in order that every case may so far as possible be determined on its real facts, and in order to speed the trial of causes or prevent the circuity of action and unnecessary expense, unless there are circumstances such as inexcusable delay, or the taking of the adverse party by surprise or the like, which might justify a refusal of permission to amend. (41 Am. Jur. pp. 490-491.) These circumstances do not obtain in these proceedings.

In view of the foregoing, the order appealed from is hereby affirmed, without special pronouncement as to costs.

Paras, C.J., Bengzon, Padilla, Bautista Angelo, Labrador, Concepción, Reyes, J.B.L., and Barrera, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main


ClubJuris.Com



August-1960 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-12362 August 5, 1960 - CECILIO E. TRINIDAD, ET AL. v. ARSENIO H. LACSON

    109 Phil 93

  • G.R. No. L-12800 August 5, 1960 - MELECIO CAJILIG, ET AL. v. FLORA ROBERSON CO.

    109 Phil 98

  • G.R. No. L-14003 August 5, 1960 - FEDERICO AZAOLA v. CESARIO SINGSON

    109 Phil 102

  • G.R. No. L-14400 August 5, 1960 - FELICISIMO GATMAITAN v. GORGONIO D. MEDINA

    109 Phil 108

  • G.R. No. L-12220 August 8, 1960 - PAULINO J. GARCIA, ET AL. v. PANFILO LEJANO, ET AL.

    109 Phil 116

  • G.R. No. L-12730 August 22, 1960 - C. N. HODGES v. AMADOR D. GARCIA

    109 Phil 133

  • G.R. No. L-12909 August 24, 1960 - FRANCISCO CRISOLOGO v. VICENTE S. DEL ROSARIO, ET AL.

    109 Phil 137

  • G.R. No. L-14637 August 24, 1960 - ATTY. RODRIGO MATUTINA v. JUDGE TEOFILO B. BUSLON, ET AL.

    109 Phil 140

  • G.R. No. L-15128 August 25, 1960 - CECILIO DIEGO v. SEGUNDO FERNANDO

    109 Phil 143

  • G.R. No. L-13105 August 25, 1960 - LUCINA BAITO v. ANATALIO SARMIENTO

    109 Phil 148

  • G.R. Nos. L-14684-86 August 26, 1960 - CATALINO CAISIP, ET AL. v. HON. JUDGE DOMINGO M. CABANGON, ET AL.

    109 Phil 150

  • G.R. No. L-15315 August 26, 1960 - ABUNDIO MERCED v. HON. CLEMENTINO V. DIEZ, ET AL.

    109 Phil 155

  • G.R. No. L-15822 August 26, 1960 - MEGIDA TINTIANGCO, ETC., ET AL. v. HON. BERNABE DE AQUINO, ET AL.

    109 Phil 163

  • G.R. No. L-9965 August 29, 1960 - LUCINA BIGLANGAWA, ET AL. v. PASTOR. B. CONSTANTINO, ET AL.

    109 Phil 168

  • G.R. No. L-14427 August 29, 1960 - BATANGAS TRANS. CO. v. GALICANO A. RIVERA, ET AL.

    109 Phil 175

  • G.R. No. L-14461 August 29, 1960 - BONIFACIO MERCADO v. PAULO M. MERCADO

    109 Phil 180

  • G.R. No. L-14518 August 29, 1960 - EUGENIA NELAYAN, ET AL. v. CECILIA NELAYAN, ET AL.

    109 Phil 183

  • G.R. No. L-14903 August 29, 1960 - KOPPEL INC. v. DANILO DARLUCIO, ET AL.

    109 Phil 191

  • G.R. No. L-14904 August 29, 1960 - CONSUELO ARRANZ, ET AL. v. VENERACION BARBERS ARRANZ

    109 Phil 198

  • G.R. No. L-15076 August 29, 1960 - ENRIQUE FERRER v. HON. E. L. DE LEON, ETC.

    109 Phil 202

  • G.R. No. L-9576 August 31, 1960 - SIXTA VENGASO, ETC. v. CENON BUENCAMINO, ET AL.

    109 Phil 206

  • G.R. No. L-9786 August 31, 1960 - ROSITA MASANGCAY, ET AL. v. MARCELO VALENCIA, ET AL.

    109 Phil 213

  • G.R. No. L-10111 August 31, 1960 - SOLEDAD ROBLES, ET AL. v. ISABEL MANAHAN DE SANTIAGO, ET AL.

    109 Phil 218

  • G.R. No. L-11910 August 31, 1960 - PLASLU v. BOGO-MEDELLIN MILLING CO., INC., ET AL.

    109 Phil 227

  • G.R. No. L-11944 August 31, 1960 - PHIL. RACING CLUB, INC., ET AL. v. ARSENIO BONIFACIO, ET AL.

    109 Phil 233

  • G.R. No. L-12005 August 31, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FRANCISCO FRAGA, ET AL.

    109 Phil 241

  • G.R. No. L-12020 August 31, 1960 - FELIXBERTO BULAHAN, ET AL. v. JUAN E. TUASON, ET AL.

    109 Phil 251

  • G.R. No. L-12286 August 31, 1960 - JOSE JAVELLANA, ET AL. v. FELICIDAD JAVELLANA, ET AL.

    109 Phil 256

  • G.R. No. L-12486 August 31, 1960 - LEONOR GRANA, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

    109 Phil 260

  • G.R. No. L-12597 August 31, 1960 - FERMIN LACAP, ET AL. v. HON. PASTOR L. DE GUZMAN, ETC.

    109 Phil 265

  • G.R. No. L-12781 August 31, 1960 - PHIL. RACING CLUB, INC. v. COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE

    109 Phil 269

  • G.R. No. L-12790 August 31, 1960 - JOEL JIMENEZ v. REMEDIOS CAÑIZARES, ET AL.

    109 Phil 273

  • G.R. No. L-12898 August 31, 1960 - ESTANISLAO PABUSTAN v. HON. PASTOR DE GUZMAN, ETC., ET AL.

    109 Phil 278

  • G.R. Nos. L-13129 & L-13179-80 August 31, 1960 - BENGUET CONSOLIDATED UNIONS COUNCIL v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

    109 Phil 280

  • G.R. No. L-13162 August 31, 1960 - C. N. HODGES v. HON. FRANCISCO ARELLANO, ET AL.

    109 Phil 284

  • G.R. No. L-13177 August 31, 1960 - SWEE DIN TAN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    109 Phil 287

  • G.R. Nos. L-13219-20 August 31, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. REMIGIO CRUZ

    109 Phil 288

  • G.R. No. L-13281 August 31, 1960 - SIARI VALLEY ESTATES, INC. v. FILEMON LUCASAN, ET AL.

    109 Phil 294

  • G.R. No. L-13353 August 31, 1960 - DOLORES NARAG v. SALVADOR CECILIO, ET AL.

    109 Phil 299

  • G.R. No. L-13581 August 31, 1960 - EPIFANIO S. CESE v. GSIS

    109 Phil 306

  • G.R. No. L-13801 August 31, 1960 - PAULINA BAUTISTA v. LEONCIO DACANAY, ET AL.

    109 Phil 310

  • G.R. No. L-14101 August 31, 1960 - ADRIANA DE BLANCO v. STA. CLARA TRANS. CO.

    109 Phil 313

  • G.R. No. L-14107 August 31, 1960 - MIGUEL MENDIOLA, ET AL. v. RICARDO TANCINCO, ET AL.

    109 Phil 317

  • G.R. No. L-14184 August 31, 1960 - IN RE: PABLO UY YAO v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    109 Phil 328

  • G.R. No. L-14357 August 31, 1960 - JOHANNA H. BORROMEO v. EZEQUIEL ZABALLERO, SR.

    109 Phil 332

  • G.R. No. L-14363 August 31, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CARIDAD CAPISTRANO

    109 Phil 337

  • G.R. No. L-14601 August 31,1960

    PNB v. EMILIANO DE LA VIÑA, ET AL.

    109 Phil 342

  • G.R. No. L-14835 August 31, 1960 - PONCIANO MEDEL, ET AL. v. JULIAN CALASANZ, ET AL.

    109 Phil 348

  • G.R. No. L-14959 August 31, 1960 - REPUBLIC SAVINGS BANK v. FAR EASTERN SURETY & INS. CO., INC.

    109 Phil 357

  • G.R. No. L-15153 August 31, 1960 - LUCIO BALONAN v. EUSEBIA ABELLANA, ET AL.

    109 Phil 359

  • G.R. No. L-15186 August 31, 1960 - GONZALO G. DE GUZMAN v. ALFREDO TRINIDAD, ET AL.

    109 Phil 363

  • G.R. No. L-15325 August 31, 1960 - PROV’L. FISCAL OF RIZAL v. HON. JUDGE CECILIA MUÑOZ PALMA, ET AL.

    109 Phil 368

  • G.R. No. L-15375 August 31, 1960 - BALTAZAR RAGPALA, ET AL. v. J. P. OF TUBOD, LANAO, ET AL.

    109 Phil 373

  • G.R. No. L-15474 August 31, 1960 - ALFREDO B. SAULO v. BRIG. GEN. PELAGIO CRUZ, ETC.

    109 Phil 378

  • G.R. No. L-15590 August 31, 1960 - ASTURIAS SUGAR CENTRAL, INC. v. CORAZON SEGOVIA, ET AL.

    109 Phil 383

  • G.R. No. L-15633 August 31, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PRIMITIVO D. ALA, ET AL.

    109 Phil 390