Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1960 > January 1960 Decisions > G.R. No. L-16360 January 29, 1960 - FILEMON SALCEDO, JR. v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS

106 Phil 953:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-16360. January 29, 1960.]

FILEMON SALCEDO, JR., Petitioner, v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL., Respondents.

Leido, Andrada, Pérez & Associates for Petitioner.

Dominador D. Dayot, Avelino C. Teaño and Ramón Barrios for respondent Commission.

Liwag & Vivo for respondent Leon Mampusti.


SYLLABUS


1. ELECTIONS; PROVINCIAL BOARD; SHOULD NOT ACT AS BOARD OF CANVASSERS; NEW MUNICIPALITY WITH MUNICIPAL COUNCIL IN EXISTENCE; STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION; SECTION 167 (b) OF ELECTION CODE INTERPRETED. — Although Section 167 (b) of the Revised Election Code provides that "for the first election in a new municipality, the provincial board shall act as board of canvassers to proclaim the result of the municipal elections," however, this provision should be interpreted in conjunction with Section 10 of the same Code which provides that "in the absence of a municipal or city council, the provincial board shall perform the duties of the former with respect to the first election in the new political subdivision," from which it is logical to infer that even if a new municipality is holding its first election to fill its municipal offices, the provincial board can only assume the functions of a municipal board of canvassers if the municipal council concerned has not yet been constituted, otherwise the latter should act. Verily, the provisions of Section 167 (b) are merely temporary in character which apply when the offices of the new municipality have not yet been duly filled.

2. ID.; ID.; ID.; IF, ALL CANDIDATES ARE FOR REELECTION. — Where members of the Provincial Board were all candidates for reelection, the are disqualified to act as members of the board of canvasser because Section 28 of the Revised Election Code provides that any member of the Provincial Board who is a candidate for all elective office shall be incompetent to act in said board in the performance of its duties in connection with the election.


D E C I S I O N


BAUTISTA ANGELO, J.:


The municipality of Bansud, Oriental Mindoro, was newly created by Republic Act No. 2514 which was approved on June 21, 1959. On November 10, 1959, said municipality held for the first time an election to fill its municipal offices, including that of mayor, and among the candidates who filed their certificates for this office were Filemon Salcedo, Jr. and Leon Mampusti.

On November 24, 1959, the Provincial Board of Oriental Mindoro, acting as municipal board of canvassers of the new municipality pursuant to the provisions of Section 167 (b) of the Revised Election Code, proclaimed Salcedo as mayor-elect with a plurality of seventy- nine (79) votes. Mampusti, who considered the proclamation invalid because the canvass was made by the provincial board and not by the municipal council of the new municipality, filed a petition with the Commission on Elections praying for the annulment of the canvass and proclamation made by said provincial board, and acting on the petition, the Commission on Elections, after proper hearing, issued a resolution on December 3, 1959 (1) annulling the canvass and proclamation as prayed for; (2) ordering the municipal board of canvassers of the new municipality to immediately make a new canvass of all the votes cast for the municipal offices in said municipality and, thereafter, proclaim the winning candidates; and (3) ordering the provincial board to deliver to the municipal treasurer all election returns submitted by the inspectors of said municipality. And considering that the Commission on Elections has no power, nor authority, to annul the canvass and proclamation made by the Provincial Board of Oriental Mindoro because its authority is merely to act on administrative questions, Filemon Salcedo, Jr. filed the present petition for certiorari with preliminary injunction before this Court praying for the setting aside of its resolution and for an order restraining it from carrying out the instructions and orders contained therein. This Court gave due course to the petition and issued a writ of preliminary injunction upon petitioner’s filing a bond in the amount of P1,000.00.

Respondents in their answer state that the canvass and proclamation made by the Provincial Board of Oriental Mindoro are null and void as said board was composed of Governor Francisco Infantado and members Leonardo Macasaet and Jose Basa who were disqualified to sit on said board because they were all candidates for reelection (Section 28, Revised Election Code); that, even assuming that the Provincial Board of Oriental Mindoro could act as board of canvassers of the new municipality, however, having failed to include in the canvass the election return of Precinct No. 5 of said municipality, the canvass and proclamation made are null and void, while the Commission on Elections has the power and authority to declare a proclamation made on incomplete returns null and void (Mintu, Et. Al. v. Enage, Et Al., G. R. No. L-1834; Abandante v. Relato, 94., 8) and that the Provincial Board of Oriental Mindoro, assuming that its members were qualified to act, could not lawfully act as municipal board of canvassers for the reason that at the time it arrogated unto itself the powers and functions of said municipal board of canvassers there was already a duly constituted set of municipal officers, or a municipal council was already then in existence. Respondents prayed that the petition be dismissed and the injunction dissolved.

There is merit in the contention that the Provincial Board of Oriental Mindoro erroneously acted as municipal board of canvassers of the new municipality for the simple reason that at the time it acted as such there was already a municipal council then in existence. While Section 167 (b) of the Revised Election Code provides that "For the first election in a new municipality, the provincial board shall act as board of canvassers to proclaim the result of the municipal elections", however, this provision should be interpreted in conjunction with Section 10 of the same Code which provides that "In the absence of a municipal or city council, the provincial board shall perform the duties of the former with respect to the first election in the new political subdivision", from which it is logical to infer that even if a new municipality is holding its first election to fill its municipal offices, the provincial board can only assume the functions of a municipal board of canvassers if the municipal council concerned has not yet been constituted, otherwise the latter should act. Verily, the provisions of Section 167(b) are merely temporary in character which apply when the offices of the new municipality have not yet been duly filed.

An added reason for the nullification of the actuation of the Provincial Board of Oriental Mindoro is the fact that its members were all disqualified to act it appearing that they were all candidates for reelection. This is clear from Section 28 of the Revised Election Code which provides that any member of the provincial board who is a candidate for an elective office shall be incompetent to act in said board in the performance of its duties in connection with the election.

Finally, we find that the Commission on Elections acted properly in nullifying the canvass and proclamation made by the Provincial Board of Oriental Mindoro not only on the grounds already mentioned but in view of the fact that said board failed to include in its canvass the election return for Precinct No. 5 in contravention of law and of the instructions given by the Commission on Elections (Mintu, Et. Al. v. Enage, Et Al., supra; Abendante v. Relato, supra).

Wherefore, petition is dismissed. The injunction issued by this Court is hereby dissolved. Costs against petitioner.

Paras, C.J., Bengzon, Padilla, Montemayor, Labrador, Concepción, Reyes, J. B. L., Endencia, Barrera and Gutiérrez David, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main


ClubJuris.Com



January-1960 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-16413 January 26, 1960 - EMILIO C. SANTOS v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS

    106 Phil 877

  • G.R. No. L-10854 January 27, 1960 - MANILA POLO CLUB v. BIBIANO L. MEER

    106 Phil 885

  • G.R. Nos. L-12091 & L-12092 January 28, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LIM HO

    106 Phil 887

  • G.R. No. L-9075 January 29, 1960 - S. V. S. PICTURES, INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS

    106 Phil 897

  • G.R. No. L-12476 January 29, 1960 - COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. ANGLO CALIFORNIA NATIONAL BANK

    106 Phil 903

  • G.R. No. L-12573 January 29, 1960 - PAULINA DURAN v. BERNARDINO PAGARIGAN

    106 Phil 907

  • G.R. Nos. L-12614 & L-12615. January 29, 1960 - JUAN ESTELLA, ET., AL. v. REGISTER OF DEEDS OF RIZAL

    106 Phil 911

  • G.R. No. L-12981 January 29, 1960 - IN RE: MARCIANO DEETUANKA v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    106 Phil 916

  • G.R. No. L-13194 January 29, 1960 - BUENAVENTURA T. SALDAÑA v. PHILIPPINE GUARANTY CO., INC.

    106 Phil 919

  • G.R. No. L-13489 January 29, 1960 - BANK OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS v. JOSE J. GONZALES

    106 Phil 925

  • G.R. No. L-13536 January 29, 1960 - ADRIANO VALDEZ v. RODRIGO OCUMEN

    106 Phil 929

  • G.R. No. L-13956 January 29, 1960 - ROMULO C. NICOLAS v. FULGENCIO DACARA

    106 Phil 934

  • G.R. No. L-14027 January 29, 1960 - LIBERTAD ALTAVAS CONLU v. COURT OF APPEALS

    106 Phil 940

  • G.R. No. L-14306 January 29, 1960 - PABLO CALION v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL.

    106 Phil 943

  • G.R. No. L-14341 January 29, 1960 - MARCIANO SONGAHID v. BENITO CINCO

    106 Phil 946

  • G.R. No. L-14359 January 29, 1960 - IN RE: SALVADORA ONG v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    106 Phil 950

  • G.R. No. L-16360 January 29, 1960 - FILEMON SALCEDO, JR. v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS

    106 Phil 953

  • G.R. No. L-6406 January 30, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. KUSAIN SAIK

    106 Phil 957

  • G.R. No. L-9483 January 30, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ELIAS NANA

    106 Phil 966

  • G.R. No. L-11215 January 30, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. QUIRINO BALOYO

    106 Phil 972

  • G.R. No. L-11430 January 30, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. TOMAS ESTACIO

    106 Phil 981

  • G.R. No. L-11756 January 30, 1960 - JOSE B. GAMBOA v. MA- AO SUGAR CENTRAL CO., INC.

    106 Phil 989

  • G.R. No. L-11908 January 30, 1960 - FLORA CAMPANERO v. APOLONIO T. COLOMA

    106 Phil 993

  • G.R. No. L-12105 January 30, 1960 - TESTATE ESTATE OF C. O. BOHANAN v. MAGDALENA C. BOHANAN

    106 Phil 997

  • G.R. No. L-12280 January 30, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PIO TEMPLONUEVO

    106 Phil 1003

  • G.R. No. L-12661 January 30, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FRANCISCO ARANDA

    106 Phil 1008

  • G.R. No. L-12692 January 30, 1960 - COSMIC LUMBER COMPANY, INC. v. AGAPITA MANAOIS

    106 Phil 1015

  • G.R. No. L-12754 January 30, 1960 - ESTANISLAO ALFONSO v. PASAY CITY

    106 Phil 1017

  • G.R. No. L-13146 January 30, 1960 - VALENTIN CASTILLO v. ARTURO SAMONTE

    106 Phil 1023

  • G.R. No. L-13160 January 30, 1960 - BIENVENIDO NERA v. PAULINO GARCIA

    106 Phil 1031

  • G.R. No. L-13274 January 30, 1960 - REMEDIOS SACLOLO v. COURT OF AGRARIAN RELATIONS

    106 Phil 1038

  • G.R. No. L-13399 January 30, 1960 - ALBERTA VICENCIO v. GAVINO TUMALAD

    106 Phil 1042

  • G.R. No. L-13456 January 30, 1960 - IRINEO C. HAMOY v. SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE

    106 Phil 1046

  • G.R. No. L-13488 January 30, 1960 - MAURO PRIETO v. HIGINIO B. MACADAEG

    106 Phil 1055

  • G.R. No. L-13551 January 30, 1960 - CONSTANCIO JOAQUIN v. ABUNDIO MADRID

    106 Phil 1060

  • G.R. No. L-13564 January 30, 1960 - ANDRES CENTENERA v. NICASIO YATCO

    106 Phil 1064

  • G.R. No. L-13764 January 30, 1960 - RAFAEL RUEDA v. MARCELO JUAN

    106 Phil 1069

  • G.R. No. L-13781 January 30, 1960 - Testate Estate of JOSE J. JAVELLANA v. JOSE JAVELLANA

    106 Phil 1073

  • G.R. No. L-14016 January 30, 1960 - ALFREDO FORMOSO v. DELFIN S. FLORES

    106 Phil 1079

  • G.R. Nos. L-14023 & L-14135 January 30, 1960 - TALISAY-SILAY MILLING CO., INC. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS

    106 Phil 1081

  • G.R. No. L-14047 January 30, 1960 - PRIMO PANTI v. PROVINCIAL BOARD OF CATANDUANES

    106 Phil 1093

  • G.R. No. L-14109 January 30, 1960 - NATIONAL LUMBER & HARDWARE CO. v. PEDRO J. VELASCO

    106 Phil 1099

  • G.R. No. L-14310 January 30, 1960 - MAURO PRIETO v. JUAN P. ENRIQUEZ

    106 Phil 1103

  • G.R. No. L-14327 January 30, 1960 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BERNARDO BORJA

    106 Phil 1111

  • G.R. No. L-14373 January 30, 1960 - GENERAL INSURANCE & SURETY CORP. v. NG HUA

    106 Phil 1117

  • G.R. No. L-14375 January 30, 1960 - ANDRES CASTILLO v. FROILAN BAYONA

    106 Phil 1121

  • G.R. No. L-14535 January 30, 1960 - BENITO SYMACO v. PATERIO AQUINO

    106 Phil 1130

  • G.R. No. L-14674 January 30, 1960 - MELECIO R. DOMINGO v. JUDGE S. C. MOSCOSO

    106 Phil 1138

  • G.R. No. L-16286 January 30, 1960 - CESAR SAMSON v. NUMERIANO G. ESTENZO

    106 Phil 1140