Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1949 > May 1949 Decisions > G.R. No. L-2014 May 16, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BENJAMIN Z. YELO

083 Phil 618:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

FIRST DIVISION

[G.R. No. L-2014. May 16, 1949.]

THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BENJAMIN Z. YELO, Defendant-Appellant.

Parreño, Parreño, Flores & Carreon for Appellant.

First Assistant Solicitor General Roberto A. Gianzon and Solicitor Augusto M. Luciano for Appellee.

SYLLABUS


JUDGMENTS; POWER OF COURTS TO REVISE, CORRECT AND CHANGE ITS ORDERS OR JUDGMENTS BEFORE EXPIRATION OF PERIOD OF APPEAL; EXCEPTIONS. — The court below retained the jurisdiction to eliminate from its order, within fifteen days from the date the defendant was notified thereof, the payment of the defendant’s back compensation. Judgment for his payment lies within the court’s sound discretion, is of civil or administrative character, and does not come within the jeopardy provision of the Constitution. With the possible exception that a judgment of acquittal may not at any time after the discharge of the accused be charged without his consent, the power of the courts to revise, correct and change the sentences before the expiration of the period for appeal and before anything has been done, was recognized in United States v. Vayson (27 Phil., 447), in which the subject was treated at great length with abundant citations of authorities.


D E C I S I O N


TUASON, J.:


This is an appeal from an order of the Court of First Instance of Negros Occidental modifying its decision in a criminal case after the case had been dismissed.

It appears that on March 25, 1947, the city attorney of Bacolod filed with the municipal court an information charging Benjamin Z. Yelo, the present appellant, with slight physical injuries. Having been found guilty of the offense charged, he was sentenced to pay a fine of P25 and costs. From that decision the defendant appealed to the Court of First Instance where the information filed with the municipal court was reproduced.

On December 23, 1947, the latter court dismissed the case in an order which reads as follows:ClubJuris

"ORDEN

"Al llamarse a vista esta causa, el acusado asistido de su abogado, Sr. Amado B. Parreño, ha comparecido. El Fiscal, Sr. Sola, manifesto que esta causa ha sido iniciada por la Fiscalia de la Ciudad de Bacolod y en vista de que ningun Fiscal de dicha oficina ha comparecido, pidio la posposicion de la vista de la misma.

"Esta causa se halla ante este Juzgado en grado de apelacion y la querella se reprodujo el 23 de Junio, 1947. La vista de la misma ha estado posoniendose: la primera vez el Noviembre 20 y la segunda vez el Noviembre 27.

"En el dia de hoy, ninguno de los testigos del gobierno ha comparecido y menos el ofendido Aguinaldo Absalon.

"Se deniega la peticion y se sobresee esta causa con las costas de oficio.

"El Sr. Amado B. Parreño, abogado de la defensa, manifesto acto continuo que el acusado es policia de la Ciudad de Bacolod y ha sido suspendido de su cargado desde la fecha de la presentacion de la querella, o sea, 25 de Marzo de esta año; habiendo sido sobreseida la misma, alego que, por virtud del Art. 2272 del Codigo Administrativo Revisado, tiene derecho no solamente a ser repuesto en el cargo sino tambien a recibir el salario correspondiente desde la fecha de su suspension hasta su reposicion pidio, en su virtud, que el Juzgado dicte una orden al efecto.

"Como se pide, se declara al referido acusado con derecho a recibir el salario correspondiente a todo el tiempo de su suspension." clubjuris

On the same date, immediately after the promulgation of the above-quoted order, the city attorney filed a motion for reconsideration. Judge Arellano, presiding over the court, refused to reconsider the dismissal of the case. But he set aside and declare null and without effect the order in so far as it provided for the payment of the salary of the accused during the period of his suspension.

It is the contention of the appellant that the lower court had no jurisdiction to make this modification in its judgment.

Section 2272 of the Revised Administrative Code reads:ClubJuris

"When a chief or member of the municipal police is accused in court of any felony or violation of law by the provincial fiscal, the municipal president shall immediately suspend the accused from office pending final decision of the case by the courts and, in case of acquittal, the accused shall be entitled to payment of the entire salary he failed to receive during his suspension if the court should so provide in his sentence." clubjuris

This provision authorizes the court to order the payment of the entire salary of a suspended member of the police force if he is acquitted. Granting, for the purpose of argument, that the dismissal of the case at bar operated as an acquittal and terminated the case definitely, it is our opinion that the court be low retained the jurisdiction to eliminate from its order, within fifteen days from the date the defendant was notified thereof, the payment of the defendant’s back compensation. Judgment for this payment lies within the court’s sound discretion, is of civil or administrative character, and does not come within the jeopardy provision of the Constitution. With the possible exception that a judgment of acquittal may not at any time after the discharge of the accused be changed without his consent, the power of the courts to revise, correct and change the sentences before the expiration of the period for appeal and before anything has been done, was recognized in United States v. Vayson, 27 Phil., 447, in which the subject was treated at great length with abundant citations of authorities. In the Vayson case and in the cases therein cited, the authority of the court to increase or mitigate the penalty imposed on the accused before the judgment became final and before it was put in operation was affirmed. One of the cases cited with approval was Ex parte Lange, 85 U.S., 163; 21 Law. ed., 872, in which this rule was laid down: "The general power of the court over its own judgments, orders and decrees, during the existence of the term to which they are first made, is undeniable." clubjuris

The Solicitor General contends that the dismissal of the case was arbitrary and unlawful and urges us to revoke the order and to decree the remand of the case for further proceeding. It is enough to say in this connection that the government not having appealed the order, assuming, without deciding, that it was appealable, the Court can not entertain the appellee’s prayer.

The appealed order is affirmed with the costs of appeal against the Appellant.

Moran, C.J., Ozaeta, Paras, Feria, Pablo, Perfecto, Bengzon, Montemayor and Reyes, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main


ClubJuris.Com



May-1949 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-1674 May 9, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PABLO SOMERA

    083 Phil 548

  • G.R. No. L-1765 May 9, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MARIO TANDUG

    083 Phil 551

  • G.R. No. L-1881 May 9, 1949 - MANILA TERMINAL COMPANY v. LA CORTE DE RELACIONES INDUSTRIALES

    083 Phil 559

  • G.R. No. L-1512 May 12, 1949 - EL PUEBLO DE FILIPINAS v. FEDERICO

    083 Phil 569

  • G.R. No. L-1900 May 12, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ALFREDO LACSON

    083 Phil 574

  • G.R. No. L-2064 May 12, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ELIGIO TORRES

    083 Phil 595

  • G.R. No. L-1769 May 13, 1949 - PURITA PANAGUITON v. FLORENTINO PATUBO

    083 Phil 605

  • G.R. No. L-1833 May 13, 1949 - MEDARDO MUÑOZ v. EMILIO RILLORAZA

    083 Phil 609

  • G.R. No. L-792 May 14, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. E.C. CAÑADA

    083 Phil 612

  • G.R. No. L-1429 May 16, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RICARDO AQUINO Y ABALOS

    083 Phil 614

  • G.R. No. L-1950 May 16, 1949 - LAO SENG HIAN v. NATIVIDAD ALMEDA LOPEZ

    083 Phil 617

  • G.R. No. L-2014 May 16, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BENJAMIN Z. YELO

    083 Phil 618

  • G.R. No. L-1212 May 18, 1949 - EL PUEBLO DE FILIPINAS v. CELESTINO BASA Y OTROS

    083 Phil 622

  • G.R. No. L-1918 May 18, 1949 - PEDRO L. FLORES v. PERFECTO R. PALACIO

    083 Phil 626

  • G.R. No. L-2484 May 18, 1949 - LEE KO v. DIONISIO DE LEON

    083 Phil 628

  • G.R. No. L-2117 May 19, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. APOLONIO SOMBILON

    083 Phil 631

  • G.R. No. L-1471 May 20, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JULIAN ORAZA

    083 Phil 633

  • G.R. No. L-1917 May 20, 1949 - CATALINO MAGLASANG v. CIRILO C. MACEREN

    083 Phil 637

  • G.R. No. L-2245 May 20, 1949 - AMBROSIO CARBUNGCO v. RAFAEL AMPARO

    083 Phil 638

  • G.R. No. L-2831 May 20, 1949 - BERNARDO TORRES v. MAMERTO S. RIBO

    083 Phil 642

  • G.R. No. L-432 May 23, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. IGNACIO CALINAWAN

    083 Phil 647

  • G.R. No. L-1795-6 May 23, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PEDRO VALDEZ

    083 Phil 650

  • G.R. No. L-1989 May 23, 1949 - JOSE REYES y RAMIREZ v. EL TRIBUNAL DE APELACION

    083 Phil 658

  • G.R. No. L-2203 May 23, 1949 - SAN MIGUEL BREWERY v. LA CORTE DE RELACIONES INDUSTRIALES

    083 Phil 663

  • G.R. No. L-2431 May 23, 1949 - CEFERINO TAVORA v. PEDRO OFIANA

    083 Phil 672

  • G.R. No. 213 May 24, 1949 - GENEROSA A. DIA v. FINANCE & MINING INVESTMENT CORP.

    083 Phil 675

  • G.R. No. L-1700 May 24, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LORENZO MINTU

    083 Phil 678

  • G.R. No. L-2004 May 24, 1949 - PABLO COTAOCO v. RAFAEL DINGLASAN

    083 Phil 681

  • G.R. No. L-2251 May 24, 1949 - EL PUEBLO DE FILIPINAS v. ELISA TANDAG

    083 Phil 683

  • G.R. No. L-1980 May 25, 1949 - CIPRIANO SEVILLA v. CEFERINO DE LOS SANTOS

    083 Phil 686

  • G.R. No. L-944 May 26, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FAUSTO AVILA

    083 Phil 687

  • G.R. No. L-1823 May 26, 1949 - GERONIMO DE LOS REYES v. ARTEMIO ELEPAÑO

    083 Phil 691

  • G.R. No. L-1825 May 26, 1949 - EL PUEBLO DE FILIPINAS v. EUGENIO BERSIDA

    083 Phil 696

  • G.R. No. L-2022 May 26, 1949 - GUIA S. J0SE DE BAYER v. ERNESTO OPPEN

    083 Phil 700

  • G.R. No. L-2161 May 26, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JAMES YOUNG

    083 Phil 702

  • G.R. No. L-2323 May 26, 1949 - M. A. ZARCAL v. S. HERRERO

    083 Phil 711

  • G.R. Nos. L-675 & L-676 May 27, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. NEMESIO LASTIMOSO

    083 Phil 714

  • G.R. No. L-1274 May 27, 1949 - PHIL. TRANSIT ASSN. v. TREASURER OF MANILA

    083 Phil 722

  • G.R. No. L-1394 May 27, 1949 - RAFAEL ROA YROSTORZA v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    083 Phil 727

  • G.R. No. L-1861 May 27, 1949 - RIZAL SURETY AND INSURANCE CO. v. BIENVENIDO A. TAN

    083 Phil 732

  • G.R. No. L-1869 May 27, 1949 - JOSE PIO BARRETTO v. N. ALMEDA LOPEZ

    083 Phil 734

  • G.R. No. L-2300 May 27, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MARCELINO TUMAOB

    083 Phil 738

  • G.R. No. L-2382 May 27, 1949 - PABLO S. RIVERA v. FRANCISCO ARELLANO

    083 Phil 744

  • G.R. No. L-1606 May 28, 1949 - IN RE: YEE BO MANN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    083 Phil 749

  • G.R. No. L-2309 May 28, 1949 - LOPE SARREAL v. SOTERO RODAS

    083 Phil 751

  • G.R. No. L-2518 May 28, 1949 - DONATA OLIVEROS DE TAN v. ENGRACIO FABRE

    083 Phil 755

  • G.R. No. L-2539 May 28, 1949 - JOSE P. MONSALE v. PAULINO M. NICO

    083 Phil 758

  • G.R. No. L-1511 May 30, 1949 - MIGUEL OJO v. JOSE V. JAMITO

    083 Phil 764

  • G.R. No. L-1550 May 30, 1949 - IN RE: FREDERICK EDWARD GILBERT ZUELLIG v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    083 Phil 768

  • G.R. No. L-1609 May 30, 1949 - REMIGIO M. PEÑA v. FRANCISCO ARELLANO

    083 Phil 773

  • G.R. No. L-1686 May 30, 1949 - EL PUEBLO DE FILIPINAS v. SANTOS TOLEDO

    083 Phil 777

  • G.R. No. L-1723 May 30, 1949 - LUZ MARQUEZ DE SANDOVAL v. VICENTE SANTIAGO

    083 Phil 784

  • G.R. No. L-1978 May 30, 1949 - EL PUEBLO DE FILIPINAS v. ANTONIO ORCULLO Y OTROS

    083 Phil 787

  • G.R. No. L-1996 May 30, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SALIP JULMAIN

    083 Phil 793

  • G.R. No. L-2031 May 30, 1949 - HERMOGENES C. LIM v. RESTITUTO L. CALAGUAS

    083 Phil 796

  • G.R. No. L-2069 May 30, 1949 - LUZON BROKERAGE CO. v. LUZON LABOR UNION

    083 Phil 801

  • G.R. No. L-2083 May 30, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SALVADOR MALIG

    083 Phil 804

  • G.R. No. L-2098 May 30, 1949 - PIO MARQUEZ v. ARSENIO PRODIGALIDAD

    083 Phil 813

  • G.R. No. L-2099 May 30, 1949 - JOSE ONG v. BIENVENIDO A. TAN

    083 Phil 834

  • G.R. No. L-2130 May 30, 1949 - FRANCISCO SANCHEZ v. PEDRO SERRANO

    083 Phil 838

  • G.R. No. L-2132 May 30, 1949 - JUAN SAVINADA v. J. M. TUASON & CO.

    083 Phil 840

  • G.R. No. 49102 May 30, 1949 - W.C. OGAN v. BIBIANO L. MEER

    083 Phil 844

  • G.R. No. L-1104 May 31, 1949 - EASTERN THEATRICAL CO. v. VICTOR ALFONSO

    083 Phil 852

  • G.R. Nos. L-1264 & L-1265 May 31, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. TIMOTEO SAGARIO

    083 Phil 862

  • G.R. No. L-1271 May 31, 1949 - BENIGNO DEL RIO v. CARLOS PALANCA TANGUINLAY

    083 Phil 867

  • G.R. No. L-1281 May 31, 1949 - JOSEPH E. ICARD v. CITY COUNCIL OF BAGUIO

    083 Phil 870

  • G.R. No. L-1298 May 31, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PEDRO SANTOS BALINGIT

    083 Phil 877

  • G.R. No. L-1299 May 31, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JACOB J. LOEWINSOHN

    083 Phil 882

  • G.R. No. L-1827 May 31, 1949 - ALFREDO CATOLICO v. IRINEO RANJO

    083 Phil 885

  • G.R. No. L-1927 May 31, 1949 - CRISTOBAL ROÑO v. JOSE L. GOMEZ

    083 Phil 890

  • G.R. No. L-1952 May 31, 1949 - FRANCISCO R. VlLLAROMAN v. FLORENTINO J. TECHICO

    083 Phil 901

  • G.R. No. L-2108 May 31, 1949 - PAMPANGA BUS CO. v. LUIS G. ABLAZA

    083 Phil 905

  • G.R. No. L-2252 May 31, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BARTOLOME BEDIA

    083 Phil 909

  • G.R. No. L-2253 May 31, 1949 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SERVANDO MANIEGO

    083 Phil 916

  • G.R. No. L-2283 May 31, 1949 - MARINA TAYZON and FLORDELIZA G. ANGELES v. RAMON YCASIANO

    083 Phil 921

  • G.R. No. L-2326 May 31, 1949 - FERNANDO ALEJO v. MARIANO GARCHITORENA

    083 Phil 924

  • G.R. No. L-2351 May 31, 1949 - FRANCISCO ARGOS v. DOMINADOR VELOSO

    083 Phil 929

  • G.R. No. L-2377 May 31, 1949 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. JUSTA G. VDA. DE GUIDO

    083 Phil 934

  • G.R. No. L-2450 May 31, 1949 - VERONICA RUPERTO v. CEFERINO FERNANDO

    083 Phil 943